707 So. 2d 975 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

cited by 26 later decisions

states following

December 2017

most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably 776 So. 2d 443 - State v. Givens (2001), 803 So. 2d 1 - State v. Frank (2001)

26 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Argersinger v. Hamlin · Wheat v. United States · Britt v. North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“"[W]e find that the retention of private counsel from a collateral source at no cost to defendant does not rob the defendant of his right to a fair trial and thus defendant may be entitled to State funding for auxiliary services. The presence of retained counsel, be this from a collateral source or pro bono, should not work a hardship against an indigent accused who otherwise would be entitled to State funded auxiliary services. The determinative question is the defendant's indigency, not whether he has derived any assistance from collateral sources. " (Emphasis added).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 803 So. 2d 1 - State v. Frank · 722 So. 2d 23 - State v. Abdullah
“Part of the state's obligation in providing effective assistance of counsel to an indigent defendant is the obligation to provide the indigent defendant's attorney with the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 879 So. 2d 173 - State v. Lee · 761 So. 2d 574 - State v. Jeff
“[T]he defendant here, having private counsel provided from a collateral source, may still be entitled to State funding for auxiliary services.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Brown v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev. · BROWN (WILLIS) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.