Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 707 SW2D 18 - Holdridge v. State

Holdridge v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2012

13 state decisions

401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Black v. State · 166 Tex. Crim. 231 - King v. State · Martin v. State · 165 Tex. Crim. 303 - Masters v. State · Arnold v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The indictment or information, or any-pleading in the case, may allege that the offense was committed in the county were the prosecution is carried on. To sustain the allegation of venue, it shall only be necessary to prove by the preponderance of the evidence that by reason of the facts in the case, the county where such prosecution is carried on has venue. Proof of venue must be demonstrated by either direct or circumstantial evidence. “Venue,” as applied to criminal cases, means the place in which the prosecution is to begin. When conduct constituting a single offense is committed in more than one county, venue is proper in any of those counties. Preponderance of the evidence means the greater weight and degree of credible evidence. Venue is not a constituent element of the offense charged, and the failure to prove venue does not negate the guilt of the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.