Ketchum v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 1999
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sullivan v. State · Snider v. State · Anderson v. State · Wiley v. State · 112 Tex. Crim. 231 - Dove v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen the owner of the property is testifying as to the value of the property, he or she may testify as to his or her opinion or estimate of the value of the property in general and commonly understood terms. Testimony of this nature is an offer of the witness’ best knowledge of the value of his property. Such testimony will constitute sufficient evidence for the trier of fact to make a determination as to value based on the witness’ credibility. This is true even in the absence of a specific statement as to “market value” or “replacement value.” (emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. MaGee v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.