Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 707 S.W.2d 865 - Stratton v. Jackson

Stratton v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2015

6 state decisions

201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Worrall v. Kroger Co. · Gallagher v. Butler · Howard v. United States · Edmondson Management Service, Inc. v. Woods · Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v. Motel System, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In conclusion, Plaintiff “has failed to produce an audit, actual books and records, or summaries thereof, or other evidence to establish that it owes less taxes than the amount assessed by the Department of Revenue. The taxpayer has done no more than to make allegations to the effect that the State’s audit method was incorrect, inapplicable or constitutes only an estimate. ...””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Moreover, this Court will not reward, directly or indirectly, the failure of a person to maintain adequate records of illegal sales of liquor by setting aside an assessment of taxes on such sales because the Commissioner based his tax assessment on an estimate. Not only does evidence support the assessment made by the Commissioner, but Plaintiff has not shown how the method of assessment was erroneous, except to allege that it was not based on any records or other evidence and was therefore arbitrary. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.