Harrison v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.2d 1023 · 1983
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Piotrowski v. City of Houston (2001), Gonzalez v. United States (2002)
23 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2401
Relies on United States v. Kubrick · A. Ernest Fitzgerald v. Robert C. Seamans, Jr. · Barrett v. United States · Lavellee v. Listi · Stoleson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“knowledge of facts that would lead a reasonable person to conclude”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the statute of limitations does not begin to run until after the [plaintiff] discovers or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should discover his injury and its cause.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.