Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 F.2d 1058 - Kinsella v. Schweiker

Kinsella v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

708 F.2d 1058 · 1983

Citation profile

189
cited by 189 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

120 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 189 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably 17814a Cutlip v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (1994), Moon v. Sullivan (1990)

120 federal appellate ·

8401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. Califano · Hephner v. Mathews · Dobrowolsky v. Califano · Landess v. Weinberger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 189 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “involves lifting no more than 20 pounds at a time with frequent lifting or carrying of objects weighing up to 10 pounds.... [A] job is in this category when it requires a good deal of walking or standing, or when it involves sitting most of the time with some pushing or pulling of arm or leg controls. To be considered capable of performing a full or wide range of light work, you must have the ability to do substantially all of these activities. If someone can do light work, we determine that he or she could also do sedentary work, unless there are additional limiting factors, such as loss of fine dexterity or inability to sit for long periods of time.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Allen v. Califano, 613 F.2d 139 , 145 (6th Cir.1980), and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.