Holloman v. Watt’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.2d 1399 · 1983
Citation profile
58 federal appellate · 17 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 123 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Clark v. Library of Congress (1984), Williams v. United States (1995)
58 federal appellate · 17 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 161A · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2675
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · United States v. Testan · Butz v. Economou · United States v. Mitchell · United States v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The party who sues the United States bears the burden of pointing to such an unequivocal waiver of immunity.”); Alnor Check Cashing v. Katz, 821 F.Supp. 307, 311 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 11 F.3d 27 (3d Cir.1993) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in his individual rather than official capacity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.