Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 F.2d 1412 - United States v. Hamilton

United States v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

708 F.2d 1412 · 1983

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
7
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably United States v. Simmons (1987), United States v. Redd (1985)

32 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

33019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Town of Mashpee v. Mashpee Tribe · Burns v. United States · Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los Angeles · Flick v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Revocation of probation after unreasonable delay or under circumstances inherently misleading to the probationer is an abuse of discretion.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““... In practice, not every violation of parole conditions automatically leads to revocation. Typically, a parolee will be counseled to abide by the conditions of parole, and the parole officer ordinarily does not take steps to have parole revoked unless he thinks that the violations are serious and continuing so as to indicate that the parolee is not adjusting properly and cannot be counted on to avoid antisocial activity.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.