Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

708 F.2d 142

Docket No. 82-3688.

Wilson v. Atwood Group

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1983.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1983-06-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1983

2 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on Wilson v. Atwood Group

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-06-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Hebert & Abbott, Lawrence E. Abbott, New Orleans, La., for Stark, et al.

¶2*143Camp, Carmouche, Palmer, Barsh & Hunter, Donald B. Ensenat, New Orleans, La., for Atwood.

¶3Hailey, McNamara, McNamara & Hall, Antonio E. Papale, Jr., Metairie, La., for Occidental Petroleum.

¶4ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶5Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOT-HAM, Circuit Judges.

¶6BY THE COURT:

¶7A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶8IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.

/708/f2d/142 · .json · Public domain