Canova v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.2d 1498 · 1983
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 5 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably Galindo v. Stoody Co. (1986), 65 Wash. App. 552 - Wheeler v. Catholic Archdiocese (1992)
12 federal appellate · 5 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 161 (§ 11 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Phelps Dodge Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · Joseph Skilken & Co. v. City of Toledo · United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In exercising [its] discretion, ... the Board must comply as far as practicable with the rules of evidence applicable in federal courts. Thus, unless the special characteristics of an administrative hearing require otherwise, the Board may revoke a subpoena only if to do so would be proper in federal district court. Such revocation generally requires a valid evidentiary objection to the material . sought under the subpoena,.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an employer is not liable for backpay during periods that an improperly discharged employee is unavailable for work due to a disability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.