United States v. Fusaro’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.2d 17 · 1983
Citation profile
74 federal appellate · 11 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably United States v. Cintolo (1987), United States v. Cresta (1987)
74 federal appellate · 11 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1005 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 656
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Pinkerton v. United States · Hamling v. United States · Michel v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the offense is described with sufficient clarity to show a violation of law, and enables the accused to know the nature and cause of the accusation against him and to plead an acquittal or conviction in bar of future prosecution for the same offense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`the sine qua non of charges of willful misapplication of bank funds is action taken with the knowledge of harm to, intent to harm, or reckless disregard for, the financial health of the bank.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[attorney's] participation in so many aspects of the scheme as well as his attempts to cover up the scheme ... provides the basis for the inference that he acted with the requisite intent and knowledge”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.