United States v. McManigal’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.2d 276 · 1983
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1963 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3563 · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Turkette · Harris v. McRae · Griffin v. United States · Nogueras v. Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc. · Parr v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“commit[s] an act with knowledge that the use of the mails will follow in the ordinary course of business, or commit[s] an act when the use of the mails can reasonably be foreseen.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“any interest he has acquired or maintained in violation of section 1962.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Congress added the forfeiture provision to RICO in order to attack the sources of economic power of organized crime in addition to removing from power and imprisoning those individuals who violate the statute. It viewed the sanctions and remedies against organized crime then available to the government as 'unnecessarily limited in scope and impact.' As enacted the forfeiture provisions are meant to reach 'the ill-gotten gains of criminals where they enter or operate an organization through a pattern of racketeering activities.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.