Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 F.2d 302 - United States v. Weston

United States v. Weston’s Empirical Analysis

708 F.2d 302 · 1983

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently April 2008 · most notably Whitlow v. State (2008), Scarpa v. Dubois (1994)

37 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

440198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Tucker · Specht v. Patterson · Delli Paoli v. United States · Pomponio v. United States · Murzyn v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “grossly incompetent professional conduct,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a minimum standard of professional representation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “United States v. Kalita, 712 F.2d 1122 , 1129 (7th Cir.1983); United States v. Phillips, 640 F.2d 87 , 92 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 991, 101 S.Ct. 2331, 68 L.Ed.2d 851 (1981); United States ex rel. Williams v. Twomey, 510 F.2d 634 , 641 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 876, 96 S.Ct. 148, 46 L.Ed.2d 109 (1975). This applies whether counsel is appointed or retained. United States v. Weston, 708 F.2d 302 , 306 (7th Cir.1983); United States ex rel. Williams v. Twomey, 510 F.2d at 640. 50 Furthermore, 51”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.