United States v. Rohrer’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.2d 429 · 1983
Citation profile
103 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 132 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably United States v. Savinovich (1988), United States v. Birges (1984)
103 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Blanton v. General Electric Credit Corp. · Goldstein v. United States · New York v. Ferber · United Mine Workers, Local No. 1854 v. National Labor Relations Board · United States v. Mazurie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]dditional instructions are left to the discretion of the judge.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“only after appellants' extensive impeachment of Green's motives on cross-examination and their discussion of part of the agreement”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“provision of cooperation agreement was proper where agreement was relevant to material facts at issue and party to agreement was subject to cross-examination as to his motives). In addition, the district court instructed the jury that it should consider Cabrera's testimony with greater caution than that of an ordinary witness. 7 Therefore, because this instance of alleged prosecutorial vouching”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.