Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 F.2d 455 - United States v. Powell

United States v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

708 F.2d 455 · 1983

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2007 · most notably United States v. Powell (1984), Hubbard v. United States (1995)

24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

200198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 843 · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Harris v. McRae · Dewees v. United States · United States v. Bramblett · Whitten v. United States · Cooper v. Fitzharris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “within the jurisdiction of any department or agency,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[s]ection 1001 is applicable to matters before the judiciary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Warning: A false or dishonest answer to a question in this affidavit may be punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.