Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 F.2d 523 - United States v. Pino

United States v. Pino’s Empirical Analysis

708 F.2d 523 · 1983

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 13 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably United States v. Troutman (1987), United States v. Muniz (1993)

47 federal appellate · 13 district · 3 state decisions

3601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 1112 · 18 U.S.C. § 1153

Relies on United States v. Marion · United States v. Calandra · United States v. Lovasco · National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Idaho · California v. Southland Royalty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “some significant infringement on the grand jury's ability to exercise independent judgment.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We are not persuaded that the circumstances as a whole show such flagrant misconduct that the grand jury was overreached or deceived in some significant way, or that the prosecutor's conduct significantly infringed on the ability of the grand jury to exercise its independent judgment. We are also not convinced that the circumstances here justify exercise of the court's supervisory power to protect the integrity of the judicial process by dismissing the indictment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Events which trigger Sixth Amendment protection are the formal indictment or information or else the actual restraints imposed by arrest and holding to answer a criminal charge....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.