United States v. Cross’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.2d 631 · 1983
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2006
11 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 243 · 28 U.S.C. § 1861 (Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968)
Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Taylor v. Louisiana · Castaneda v. Partida · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Strauder v. West Virginia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“probably does not have the potential for influence on the grand jury's deliberations”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[h]e does not participate in the grand jury voting process.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The court shall appoint one of the jurors to be foreman and another to be deputy foreman. The foreman shall have power to administer oaths and affirmations and shall sign all indictments. He or another juror designated by him shall keep a record of the number of jurors concurring in the finding of every indictment and shall file the record with the clerk of the court, but the record shall not be made public except on order of the court. During the absence of the foreman, the deputy foreman shall act as foreman.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.