Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 F.2d 655 - Sweat v. Miller Brewing Co.

Sweat v. Miller Brewing Co.’s Empirical Analysis

708 F.2d 655 · 1983

Citation profile

363
cited by 363 later decisions
2
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

68 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 363 later decisions — most recently May 2012 · most notably Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp. (1991), Van T. Junkins & Associates, Inc. v. U.S. Industries, Inc. (1984)

68 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

21201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Pullman-Standard v. Swint · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Akers v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 363 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'granting of summary judgment is especially questionable'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.