Wald v. Regan’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.2d 794 · 1983
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 211A (First Responders Passport Act) · 50 U.S.C. § 1621 · 50 U.S.C. § 1701 (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) · 50 U.S.C. § 1703 · 50 U.S.C. § 4305
Relies on Shapiro v. Thompson · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer · Zemel v. Rusk · United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. · Aptheker v. Secretary of State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) All transactions ordinarily incident to travel to and from Cuba. (2) All transactions ordinarily incident to travel in Cuba, including payment of living expenses and the acquisition in Cuba of goods for personal consumption there. (3) The purchase in Cuba, and importation as accompanied baggage, of merchandise with a foreign market value not to exceed $100 per person, for personal use only. Such merchandise may not be resold. The authorization in this subparagraph may only be used once in every six consecutive months. (4) All transactions by any person incident to arranging or assisting travel by any other person or group of persons to, from, or in Cuba. This authorization includes arranging through transportation to Cuba; selling passage aboard a foreign carrier providing regularly scheduled service to Cuba from points outside the United States; chartering an aircraft or vessel; arranging hotel accommodations in Cuba; ground transportation, local tours and similar travel activities in Cuba; transfer of funds to Cuba or any national thereof; and receipt from Cuba or a national thereof of consideration for authorized services. (5) All transactions on behalf of aircraft or vessels incidental to nonscheduled flights or voyages to, from, and in Cuba. This paragraph does not authorize the carriage of any merchandise to and from Cuba except accompanied baggage and merchandise authorized by paragraph (a)(3) of this section. (6) All transactions incident to the processing and pay”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To have required the President to announce publicly a new declaration of emergency in order to continue an existing embargo would have required him to undertake a political act with international political impact. The result, as described by Prof. Lowenfeld before the subcommittee, might have been an “inappropriate interference in negotiations being carried out by the Executive Branch.... ” .... Assistant Treasury Secretary Bergsten repeated this theme, stating that “a unilateral termination of the embargoes” that would require the President to reassert a national emergency “would severely undermine the U.S. negotiating position with those countries, and our worldwide posture.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In the First Circuit, a plaintiff must satisfy four criteria in order to be entitled to a preliminary injunction. The Court must find: (1) that, plaintiff will suffer irreparable injury if the injunction is hot granted; (2) that such injury outweighs any harm which granting injunctive relief would inflict on the defendant; (3) that plaintiff has exhibited a likelihood of success on the merits; and (4) that the public interest will not be adversely affected by the granting of the injunction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.