Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 F.2d 96 - Aitchison v. Raffiani

Aitchison v. Raffiani’s Empirical Analysis

708 F.2d 96 · 1983

Citation profile

133
cited by 133 later decisions
5
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

62 federal appellate · 24 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 133 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably Gavalik v. Continental Can Co. (1987), Garcia v. Wilson (1984)

62 federal appellate · 24 district · 7 state decisions

7001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Buckley v. Valeo · Butz v. Economou · Carey v. Piphus · Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 133 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we look to the function the individual performs rather than his location within a particular branch of government”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “because the borough attorney was acting in direct assistance of [the activity] entitled to absolute immunity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the essential nature of the federal claim within the scheme created by the various state statutes of limitation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.