Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 F.3d 1051 - Minnesota Majority v. Mansky

Minnesota Majority v. Mansky’s Empirical Analysis

708 F.3d 1051 · 2013

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
June 2021
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 7 district ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · City of Canton v. Harris · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Broadrick v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If an as-applied challenge is successful, the statute may not be applied to the challenger, but is otherwise enforceable.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Although a complaint need not contain ‘detailed factual allegations,’ it must contain facts with enough specificity ‘to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.’ ”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[n]othing in the Constitution requires the [government freely to giant access to all who wish to exercise their right to free speech on'every type of [government property without regard to the nature of the property or to the disruption that might be caused by the speaker’s activities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.