United States v. Lopesierra-Gutierrez’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.3d 193 · 2013
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 21 U.S.C. § 959
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Barker v. Wingo · Cuyler v. Sullivan · McCarthy v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the complexity of the case, the nature of the prosecution, and that it would be unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or for the trial itself within the time limits established under the Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“courts have an independent interest in ensuring that criminal trials are conducted within the ethical standards of the profession and that legal proceedings appear fair to all who observe them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“conflicting authority as to whether a criminal defendant-as opposed to the extraditing state-has standing to assert the doctrine of specialty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.