Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 F.3d 223 - United States v. Bell

United States v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

708 F.3d 223 · 2013

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
June 2020
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Massaro v. United States · United States v. Rashad · United States v. Mohammed · United States v. Holland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Due to the fact-intensive nature of the Strickland inquiry and the likelihood, when a defendant asserts his sixth amendment claim for the first time on direct appeal, that the relevant facts will not be part of the trial record, ... this court’s general practice is to remand the claim for an evidentiary hearing unless the trial record alone conclusively shows that the defendant either is or is not entitled to relief.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “raises a 'colorable and previously unexplored' ineffective assistance claim on appeal,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.