United States v. Desnoyers’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.3d 378 · 2013
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (Drug and Alcohol Dependent Offenders Treatment Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3664
Relies on Gall v. United States · United States v. Cavera · United States v. Rigas · United States v. Jones · United States v. Carboni
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'deferential abuse-of-discretion standard.' " United States v. Cavera , 550 F.3d 180 , 189 (2d Cir. 2008) (in banc) (quoting Gall , 552 U.S. at 41 , 128 S.Ct. 586 ). However, "[a] sentencing court's legal application of the Guidelines is reviewed de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Substantive reasonableness is also reviewed for abuse of discretion....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.