United States v. Maldonado’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.3d 38 · 2013
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Dusky v. United States · Wheat v. United States · Morris v. Slappy · United States v. Zannino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the district court exhibited an unreasonable and arbitrary insistence upon expeditiousness in the face of a justifiable request for delay.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“show that the judge's decision caused specific, 'substantial prejudice.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.