United States v. Hernandes’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.3d 680 · 2013
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Gonzalez v. Crosby · United States v. Key · Spencer ad hoc Equity Committee v. Idearc, Inc. · In re Lindsey · United States v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“generally permitted only one motion under § 2255 and may not file successive motions without first obtaining this Court's authorization.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“attacks the federal court's previous resolution of a claim on the merits”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“defect in the integrity of [his] federal habeas proceedings,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gilkers v. Vannoy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.