United States v. Kurlemann’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.3d 722 · 2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 15 U.S.C. § 662 · 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77W (§ 23 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1010 · 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 1027
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Olano · Blockburger v. United States · Yates v. United States · Griffin v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Fraud has long been understood to include a broader range of deceptive conduct. “The gist of the action,” in the Supreme Court’s words, “is fraudulently producing a false impression upon the mind of the other party; and, if this result is accomplished, it is unimportant whether the means of accomplishing it are words or acts of the defendant, or his concealment or suppression of material facts not equally within the knowledge or reach of the plaintiff.” Stewart v. Wyo. Cattle Ranche Co., 128 U.S. 383 , 388, 9 S.Ct. 101 , 32 L.Ed. 439 (1888); see also Black’s Law Dictionary 731 (9th ed.2009) (defining fraud as “[a] knowing misrepresentation of the truth or concealment of a material fact to induce another to act to his or her detriment”).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.