United States v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.3d 832 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2252
Relies on United States v. Sanders · Inland Bulk Transfer Co. v. Cummins Engine Co. · United States v. Bilderbeck · United States v. Khalil · United States v. Stout
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“limited jurisdiction to take actions in aid of the appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“specifically intended to create child pornography”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.