Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 F.3d 934 - In re Canopy Financial, Inc.

In re Canopy Financial, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

708 F.3d 934 · 2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
July 2015
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 544

Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · United States v. West Grand Avenue Chicago Illinois · Cracco v. Vitran Express, Inc. · Robb v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. · Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Lake Shore Asset Management Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the determination is at bottom an equitable one, taking account of all relevant circumstances surrounding the party’s omission. These include ... the danger of prejudice to the debtor, the length of the delay and its potential impact on judicial proceedings, the reason for the delay, including whether it was within the reasonable control of the movant, and whether the movant acted in good faith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.