United States v. Abdur-Rahman’s Empirical Analysis
708 F.3d 98 · 2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998) · 18 U.S.C. § 1028A · 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Anders v. California · Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · United States v. Albertini · Corley v. United States · Hibbs Director Arizona Department of Revenue v. Winn et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For purposes of this section, the term `felony violation enumerated in subsection (c)’ means any offense that is a felony violation of-(5) any provision contained in chapter 63 (relating to mail, bank, and wire fraud) ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i] during and in relation to any felony violation enumerated in subsection (c), [ii] knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, [iii] without lawful authority, [iv] a means of identification of another person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“means of identification of another person”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.