United States v. Faustino Ngay’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Spencer v. Kemna · United States of America v. Aaron Ferguson · United States of America v. William Douglas Lankford III · United States v. Churchwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unequivocally declared to the deportation officer ... that he would not go[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“jerking his arms and thrashing about to escape the officers' hold”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“physically resisted the deportation officers' efforts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.