United States v. Norquay’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 13 (Assimilative Crimes Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 48 U.S.C. § 1612
Relies on Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co. · Watt v. Alaska · United States v. Binder · United States v. Smith · United States v. Pinto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]xcept as otherwise specifically provided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.