708 F. Supp. 310 - United States v. Frey’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2001
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 28 U.S.C. § 2415 (Indian Claims Limitation Act of 1982)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Federal Communications Commission v. Home Box Office, Inc. · Bill Ewing and Bill Ewing Service Center, Inc. v. Amoco Oil Company, Bill Ewing and Bill Ewing Service Center, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corporation and Amoco Oil Company · Roberts v. Morton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.