708 F. Supp. 525 - Zucker v. Katz’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably 726 F. Supp. 494 - Giuntoli v. Garvin Guybutler Corp. (1989), 964 F. Supp. 783 - Strougo Ex Rel. Brazil Fund, Inc. v. Scudder, Stevens & Clark, Inc. (1997)
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Murphy v. American Home Products Corp. · Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp. · Luce v. Edelstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Costs of Previously-Dismissed Action. If a plaintiff who has once dismissed an action in any court commences an action based upon or including the same claim against the same defendant, the court may make such order for the payment of costs of the action previously dismissed as it may deem proper and may stay the proceedings in the action until the plaintiff has complied with the order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under New York law ... this alleged agreement is within the statute of frauds.... [which] unequivocally provides that such an agreement ... shall not be denied effect as a defense or as the basis of an action or counterclaim ... provided the promise of the party against whom it is sought to enforce the accord is in writing and signed by such party or his agent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.