708 F. Supp. 641 - Mesalic v. Fiberfloat Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · McGee v. International Life Insurance · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Fiberfloat's attempt to accommodate Mesalic should not be turned against it ... [to find jurisdiction in] a state with which it otherwise had no minimum contacts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“for purposes of this motion, delivery of the vessel will be deemed to have been effected in Florida.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“upon commercial activity and commercial courtesy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.