Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 FSUPP 792 - Birdsong v. Olson

Birdsong v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
February 2004
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1011 (§ 1 of the McCarran-Ferguson Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1341 · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. · Pilot Life Insurance v. Dedeaux · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Massachusetts · Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fiduciaries [within ERISA] include the plans’ sponsoring employers, members of administrative committees of the plans, plan administrators, and trustees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.