Passlogix, Inc. v. 2FA TECHNOLOGY, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A fraud on the court occurs where it is established by clear and convincing evidence that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability to impartially adjudicate a matter by ... unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposition party’s claim or defense.” Passlogix, Inc. v. 2PA Tech., LLC, 708 F.Supp.2d 378, 393 (S.D.N.Y.2010) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.