708 F. Supp. 2d 69 - Knowlton v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Imbler v. Pachtman · Butz v. Economou · State of New Hampshire v. State of Maine · Burns v. Reed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“James Valdez, Michael Buckley, and Bruce Jordan all repeatedly represented to Alan Knowlton that the Bureau required his termination as a condition of the April 11, 2005 Consent Agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.