Purdy v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2018
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on New Jersey v. T. L. O. · Griffin v. Wisconsin · Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Cummings v. West
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] State's operation of a probation system presents 'special needs' beyond normal law enforcement that may justify departures from the usual warrant and probable-cause requirements.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Allen v. State · Micheau v. State“[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Allen v. State · Micheau v. State“[i]n-home detention, like probation or incarceration, is a form of criminal punishment. Like probation, in-home detention is one point “on a continuum of possible punishments ranging from solitary confinement in a maximum-security facility to a few hours of mandatory community service.” In-home detention is likewise a conditional liberty dependent on the observance of-special restrictions that are meant to assure that the detention serves as a period of genuine rehabilitation and that the community is not harmed by the detainee’s having frequent contact with the public. These same goals require and justify the exercise of supervision to assure that the restrictions are in fact observed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.