Stewart v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2012
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Marriage of Moody v. Moody · Stevens v. Stevens · Moore v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a)A court of this state which is competent to decide child custody matters has jurisdiction to make a child custody determination by initial or modification decree if: (1)this state (A) is the home state of the child at the time of commencement of the proceeding, or (B) had been the child’s home state within six (6) months before commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from this state because of his removal or retention by a person claiming his custody or for other reasons, and a parent or person acting as parent continues to live in this state; (2) it is in the best interest of the child that a court of this state assume jurisdiction because (A) the child and his parents, or the child and at least one (1) contestant, have a significant connection with this state, and (B) there is available in this state substantial evidence concerning the child’s present or future care, protection, training, and personal relationships; (3) the child is physically present in this state and the child has been abandoned; or (4)(A) it appears that no other state would have jurisdiction under prerequisites substantially in accordance with paragraphs (1), (2), or (3) or another state has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that this state is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the child, and (B) it is in the best interest of the child that this court assume jurisdiction. (b) Except under paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (a) physical presence in th”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Meyer v. Meyer · Rios v. Rios“Given that LK. had not resided in Indiana for either five and a half or six months prior to Stephan's petition, Indiana cannot be LK.'s home state under this definition. Prior decisions of this court have clarified that, pursuant to Ind. Code § 81-17-8-2 (5), when a child is visiting a parent in a state other than the custodial parent's home state, the time so spent is a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Meyer v. Meyer“North Carolina has home state jurisdiction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.