Mumm v. Mornson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Hayek v. City of St. Paul (2007), Gordon v. Frank (2006)
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · County of Sacramento v. Lewis · Rochin v. People of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. EMERGENCY DRIVING POLICY ... [Officers will use their reasonable professional judgment in deciding when, where, and to what extent they will initiate pursuit of suspects in motor vehicles. % * * # Hs # 3. INITIATING OR CONTINUING A PURSUIT ... Officers will not initiate a pursuit and will discontinue a pursuit in progress whenever any of the following conditions exist: * * * # * * 2. The officer can establish the identification of the offender so that an apprehension can be made at another time. # % j|c He ;Js % Any officers involved in a pursuit have the right to decide whether or not to terminate their participation in a pursuit, or to transfer their responsibility to another squad.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a sufficiently narrow standard of conduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gordon v. Frank
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.