Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 NW2D 673 - In re S.A.

In re S.A.’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
9
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2024

22 state decisions

120200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Santosky v. Kramer · Goldberg v. Kelly · Lassiter v. Department of Social Services of Durham County North Carolina · In re the Termination of Parental Rights over D.H.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and had to watch for the police while Mother and Father shoplifted. S.A. also revealed that Father had told her to keep the fighting between Mother and Father and the abuse of the children a secret. [¶ 7.] Another disclosure occurred when S.A. and Tara Olson-Larson, a licensed children's therapist, were looking at a book regarding foster care, abuse, and the legal system. During this counseling session, S.A. turned the book back to a page on sexual abuse and asked,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re SA
  2. “[3] She also suggested that Father caused the injuries to E.A. Jr. but felt the children were blaming her because they were afraid of him. Significantly, even after being confronted with documented evidence of domestic abuse, Mother and Father continued to deny all allegations of physical abuse between them and claimed the police reports were false. Mother even denied the 2003 incident at the Children's Inn, claiming DSS and the Children's Inn”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re SA
  3. “hearsay was fundamentally unfair. They rely upon the Supreme Court's recent restriction on the use of testimonial hearsay in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). Crawford held that under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re SA

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.