Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 P2D 463 - People v. Sabell

People v. Sabell’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2001

8 state decisions

50198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Treat · Hunter v. District Ct. in & for Twentieth Jud. Dist. · People v. Quinn · People Ex Rel. Russel v. DISTRICT COURT FOR FOURTH JD · People v. Holder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The prosecuting attorney, with the consent of the court having trial jurisdiction, may file a direct information if: [[Image here]] (2) A preliminary hearing was held in the county court and the accused person was discharged....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.