Secrest v. Simonet’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2018
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1073
Relies on Minneapolis St Co v. Peoria & P U Ry Co · Bell v. Bower · Norquist v. Norquist · Light v. Cronin · Richardson v. Cronin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The filing of an information or complaint in the district court by the district attorney gives the court subject matter jurisdiction of the offense charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Garcia“A court's acquisition of subject matter and personal jurisdiction depends on facts existing at the time jurisdiction is invoked.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Garcia
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.