Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 S.E.2d 191 - In Re LH

In Re LH’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 142 N.C. App. 607 - In Re Blackburn · 151 N.C. App. 94 - In Re Anderson · 169 N.C. App. 423 - In Re PM · 147 N.C. App. 349 - In Re Nesbitt · Bell v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consistently held that in order for a parent to have an appropriate alternative child care arrangement, the parent must have taken some action to identify viable alternatives.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he petitioner has the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that at least one of the statutory grounds listed in N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7B-1111 exists. Findings of fact supported by competent evidence are binding on appeal even if evidence has been presented contradicting those findings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “incapable of providing for the proper care and supervision of the children, [Nancy] and [Steven], such that the children are dependent juveniles ... and that there is a reasonable probability that such incapability will continue for the foreseeable future.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.