Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 S.E.2d 626 - In Re Rj

In Re Rj’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 259 Ga. App. 537 - In Re AM · In the Interest of J. T. W. · 270 Ga. App. 26 - In Re JTW · In the Interest of S. N. H. · In the Interest of D. H.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]ur responsibility as an appellate court is to determine whether, after reviewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the lower court's judgments, any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the natural parent's rights to custody have been lost. This Court neither weighs evidence nor determines the credibility of witnesses; rather, we defer to the trial court's factfinding and affirm unless the appellate standard is not met. [1]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Evidence of past unfitness, standing alone, is insufficient to terminate the rights of a parent in her natural child; clear and convincing evidence of present unfitness is required. But the trial court is entitled to consider evidence of the parent's past actions in determining whether the deprivation is likely to continue. It is not bound by mere promises to do better in the future. [7]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the juvenile court was authorized to consider the children's need for a stable home situation and the detrimental effects of prolonged foster care.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.