MacIas v. State

Carlos MACIAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 6, 1998.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-05-06

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2009

3 state decisions

Relies on Kansas v. Hendricks · Fletcher v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-05-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bernard S. Fernandez, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ettie Feistmann, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We affirm the trial court's post-sentencing designation of appellant as a sexual predator finding there to be no violation of the double jeopardy clause. See Kansas v. Hendricks, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 2072, 138 L.Ed.2d 501 (1997); see also Fletcher v. State,699 So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Further, we find that the state presented the necessary statutory predicate in order to designate appellant a sexual predator.

¶5POLEN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.