708 So. 2d 1143 - State v. Domino’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Creel · 373 So. 2d 1284 - State v. Bonanno · 540 So. 2d 1110 - State v. Byrd · State v. Jackson · 608 So. 2d 1058 - State v. Ford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state and the defendant shall have the right before argument to submit to the court special written charges for the jury. Such charges may be received by the court in its discretion after argument has begun. The party submitting the charges shall furnish a copy of the charges to the other party when the charges are submitted to the court. A requested special charge shall be given by the court if it does not require qualification, limitation, or explanation, and if it is wholly correct and pertinent. It need not be given if it is included in the general charge or in another special charge to be given.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“rebut an express or implied charge against [Artberry] of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.