708 So. 2d 267 - Kalway v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2013
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 685 So. 2d 773 - Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc. · 663 So. 2d 1049 - In Re Family Law Rules of Procedure · 682 So. 2d 1162 - Van Meter v. Singletary · 667 So. 2d 195 - Amendment to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.100(a) · 685 So. 2d 973 - Kalway v. Singletary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Applicability. This rule applies to actions for the issuance of writs of mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, certiora-ri, and habeas corpus. [[Image here]] (c) Time. A complaint shall be filed within the time provided by law, except that a complaint for common law certio-rari shall be filed within 30 days of rendition of the matter sought to be reviewed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“deferred to the expertise of the legislature in implementing its rules of procedure. See, e.g., Amendment to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.100(a), 667 So.2d 195, 195 (Fla.1996) (noting that the need for juvenile detention shall be made “according to the criteria provided by law” and explaining that these “include those requirements set out in section 39.042, Florida Statutes (1995)”); In re Family Law Rules of Procedure, 663 So.2d 1049, 1086 (Fla.1995) (setting forth amended rule 12.740, which provides that all contested family matters may be referred to mediation, “[e]xeept as provided by law”).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Any court action challenging prisoner disciplinary proceedings conducted by the Department of Corrections pursuant to s. 944.28(2) must be commenced within 30 days after final disposition of the prisoner disciplinary proceedings through the administrative grievance process under chapter 33, Florida Administrative Code. Any action challenging prisoner disciplinary proceedings shall be barred by the court unless it is commenced within the time period provided by this section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.