Orleans Parish School Bd. v. Gegg’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 591 So. 2d 342 - Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rs · 685 So. 2d 691 - Hayes v. Autin · 684 So. 2d 488 - Oakley v. Thebault · 560 So. 2d 971 - Anderson Window & Patio Co. v. Dumas · 607 So. 2d 719 - Young v. Oberhelman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[LSA-C.C.] Articles 2315 and 2316 provide causes giving rise to tort actions, including negligent misrepresentation, between parties whose relationship is ungoverned by specific titles of the Civil Code. Appropriately, the section of the Louisiana Civil Code, which includes article 2315 and 2316, is Book III, Title V, Chapter 3 entitled Obligations Arising Without Agreement. The heading illustrates the idea that the articles therein only govern the relationship between parties in the absence of more specific articles.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The Contractor will not be permitted to sign the contract before the School Board Notary until the Certificates of Insurance or insurance policies have been approved by the School Board insurance consultant. In the event the successful contractor fails to provide the Certificates of Insurance or insurance policy for review, the amount of guaranty deposited by him will be forfeited to the Orleans Parish School Board, not as a penalty but as acknowledged liquidated damage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We have reviewed the Certificate of Insurance for the above captioned [Karr relocation project] and find it meets the necessary requirements for School Board purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.